Thursday, June 30, 2005
It's not a case of "believing"
I've always loved stories of the supernatural, from beasties to ghosts to UFOs. They make the mundane interesting, they open up all sorts of possibilities and allow us to realise that we don't "know everything", that there is some stuff out there that eludes explanation.
Finding real ghost stories is not hard. The internet is full of ghost pictures, some old classics, others snapped via ghost cams on the internet. It's easy to dismiss these as hoaxes but Photoshop wasn't always around.
So why am I rabitting on about the paranormal?
Well, I'm a journalist. And because I follow these things I see the stories of ghosts, UFOs and strange beasts that are reported in local newspapers - some with pictures and even video footage. And yet these stories seem to not be dealt with by the mainstream media.
This is not some wild eyed hippie talking about his experiences alone at Stonehenge.
A case in point, the recent sightings (June 24 2005) in Xalapa Mexico, where in full view of the public, the press and government officials multiple UFOs appeared. This was reported in the local press, on the local news which showed video of the UFOs and the amazed officials. Yet not a word of this was put out on any mainstream press wire. Not Reuters, Associated Press, Agence France Presse - no one picked it up. You can read about it here... http://www.rense.com/general66/massive.htm
Rense.com is one of my favourite links. It gives the news and then lets you know if it's incorrect or found out to be a hoax. That's journalism with chutzpah! And it makes a lot better reading than dreary reports of highway bypasses and yet another analysis on why Americans are getting killed in Iraq. But enough about Rense.
I have a problem with paranormal stories not being reported. It allows us to believe these sorts of things no longer happen. It is what amounts to a tacit deceit among the profession charged with telling the truth. When a glimpse of Janet Jackson's nipple can drive weeks of frenzied media activity and a fleet of Unidentified Flying Objects caught on camera, seen by multiple witnesses is deemed unworthy of a mention you have to wonder who is making the decisions.
Finding real ghost stories is not hard. The internet is full of ghost pictures, some old classics, others snapped via ghost cams on the internet. It's easy to dismiss these as hoaxes but Photoshop wasn't always around.
So why am I rabitting on about the paranormal?
Well, I'm a journalist. And because I follow these things I see the stories of ghosts, UFOs and strange beasts that are reported in local newspapers - some with pictures and even video footage. And yet these stories seem to not be dealt with by the mainstream media.
This is not some wild eyed hippie talking about his experiences alone at Stonehenge.
A case in point, the recent sightings (June 24 2005) in Xalapa Mexico, where in full view of the public, the press and government officials multiple UFOs appeared. This was reported in the local press, on the local news which showed video of the UFOs and the amazed officials. Yet not a word of this was put out on any mainstream press wire. Not Reuters, Associated Press, Agence France Presse - no one picked it up. You can read about it here... http://www.rense.com/general66/massive.htm
Rense.com is one of my favourite links. It gives the news and then lets you know if it's incorrect or found out to be a hoax. That's journalism with chutzpah! And it makes a lot better reading than dreary reports of highway bypasses and yet another analysis on why Americans are getting killed in Iraq. But enough about Rense.
I have a problem with paranormal stories not being reported. It allows us to believe these sorts of things no longer happen. It is what amounts to a tacit deceit among the profession charged with telling the truth. When a glimpse of Janet Jackson's nipple can drive weeks of frenzied media activity and a fleet of Unidentified Flying Objects caught on camera, seen by multiple witnesses is deemed unworthy of a mention you have to wonder who is making the decisions.
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Thoughts on Zimbabwe
As an ex-pat South African living in Hong Kong I consider myself to be very fortunate. This strange little region (yes it is part of China but sort of governs itself) is the place I hope to call home. But that doesn't stop me from being interested in the goings on in Africa.
Naturally everyone has been shocked and outraged by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's "Operation Clean out the trash" which has left hundreds of thousands of the country's poorest people without homes during the cold winter.
It drives me to want to help. But realistically, what can one person do?
It's not a question of money anymore - even if I did send some that would be a small interim measure for one person.
So we look to the powers that be, do ACT.
So far South African President Thabo Mbeki has remained silent on what amounts to genocide on his borders. This does not bode well for South Africans who I am sure are wondering if they can expect the same kind of treatment sometime in the future.
The great Nelson Mandela, respected world leader has, too, remained silent.
The United Nations is not fulfilling any sort of function. And the US has sent a strongly worded message.
But when we examine the problem the solutions are limited. Sanctions will only hurt the people, not the government as Mugabe continues to cozy up to China and get whatever he wants from there. Food aid, which is sure to be needed in the near future is at best a temporary solution, at worst giving Mugabe another weapon with which to beat his opposition by withholding food.
The laughable idea of another American invasion into an undemocratic country to rescue its people will only result in wholesale slaughter of innocents, if it were to happen at all.
The ugly fact is that the change has to come from within.
Alan Stang in his article on the coming "American Gulag" quotes Soviet dissident author Alexander Solzhenitsyn whose writings are chillingly apt to Zimbabwe today:
"At what exact point, then, should one resist? When one's belt is taken away. When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one's home? . . . ." The same questions that are bothering you now. Solzhenitsyn bitterly laments the Russian failure to resist:
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . ."
". . . After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you,d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur"what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"
The average Zimbabwean has nothing left to lose, if we are to believe the reports coming out of that country. It's time they realised the cavalry isn't coming.
Naturally everyone has been shocked and outraged by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's "Operation Clean out the trash" which has left hundreds of thousands of the country's poorest people without homes during the cold winter.
It drives me to want to help. But realistically, what can one person do?
It's not a question of money anymore - even if I did send some that would be a small interim measure for one person.
So we look to the powers that be, do ACT.
So far South African President Thabo Mbeki has remained silent on what amounts to genocide on his borders. This does not bode well for South Africans who I am sure are wondering if they can expect the same kind of treatment sometime in the future.
The great Nelson Mandela, respected world leader has, too, remained silent.
The United Nations is not fulfilling any sort of function. And the US has sent a strongly worded message.
But when we examine the problem the solutions are limited. Sanctions will only hurt the people, not the government as Mugabe continues to cozy up to China and get whatever he wants from there. Food aid, which is sure to be needed in the near future is at best a temporary solution, at worst giving Mugabe another weapon with which to beat his opposition by withholding food.
The laughable idea of another American invasion into an undemocratic country to rescue its people will only result in wholesale slaughter of innocents, if it were to happen at all.
The ugly fact is that the change has to come from within.
Alan Stang in his article on the coming "American Gulag" quotes Soviet dissident author Alexander Solzhenitsyn whose writings are chillingly apt to Zimbabwe today:
"At what exact point, then, should one resist? When one's belt is taken away. When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one's home? . . . ." The same questions that are bothering you now. Solzhenitsyn bitterly laments the Russian failure to resist:
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . ."
". . . After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you,d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur"what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"
The average Zimbabwean has nothing left to lose, if we are to believe the reports coming out of that country. It's time they realised the cavalry isn't coming.
